Keith Lamont Scott | Charlotte Police Shooting and Prosecutor’s No-Charge Decision

Hall of Records • Justice & Accountability • Disputed Death

Keith Lamont Scott | Charlotte Police Shooting and Prosecutor’s No-Charge Decision

Keith Lamont Scott, 43, was fatally shot by Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer Brentley Vinson during an encounter at an apartment complex.

RecordKeith Lamont Scott
LocationCharlotte, North Carolina
DateSeptember 20, 2016
StatusMecklenburg County Prosecutor Found Officer’s Use of Deadly Force Lawful · No Criminal Charges

Keith Lamont Scott
Color Of Change — portrait of Keith Lamont Scott.

Record Summary

At a Glance

Keith Lamont Scott, 43, was fatally shot by Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer Brentley Vinson during an encounter at an apartment complex.

Official Record

What Authorities and Courts Established

The Mecklenburg County District Attorney concluded in 2016 that Vinson’s use of deadly force was lawful under North Carolina law and that criminal charges were not warranted.

Public Dispute and Social Context

Why the Case Became a Flashpoint

Scott’s family disputed key elements of the police account, including what he was holding and how the encounter unfolded. The shooting led to days of protests and unrest in Charlotte.

Legal Outcome

Where the Record Stands

The local criminal review ended without charges. The prosecutor’s report set out the evidence and legal reasoning supporting the no-charge decision.

Why This Record Matters

The 2012–2020 Racial-Justice Era

Scott’s death became a key case in debates over release of body-camera and dash-camera footage, competing witness accounts and the public’s ability to evaluate official narratives.

Sources

Review the Record

Featured image: Color Of Change — portrait of Keith Lamont Scott.

Image-use note: External advocacy image. Confirm reuse rights and attribution before publication.

Hall of Records verification notice — September 24, 2026:
“Disputed Death” is a Hall of Records editorial classification used to preserve deaths that became significant public disputes about race, policing, self-defense, custody, institutional accountability or the legal system. It does not override a court verdict, medical-examiner ruling or prosecutorial finding. This entry separates official legal outcomes from family concerns, public controversy, historical interpretation and unresolved questions.
Haus of Asseveration
Logo
Shopping cart